Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of

Belarus, Republic of: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural was 12.7% in 2019. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2019)
12.7%
Change on year
down 19.3%
World rank
10th
of 30 countries
All-time high
19.6%
in 2013
All-time low
12.7%
in 2017
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of, 2008–2019

051015202008201320192008: 17.92009: 16.82010: 17.32012: 17.12013: 19.62014: 162015: 15.62016: 15.62017: 12.72018: 15.72019: 12.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of is 12.7%, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 19.3% on the previous year and down 24.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of peaked at 19.6% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 12.7%, in 2017.

Belarus, Republic of ranks 10th of 30 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.4% 16.8% 17.9% 2
2010s 15.8% 12.7% 19.6% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus, Republic of

  1. 7 Poland, Republic of 15.5% compare
  2. 8 Romania 14.8% compare
  3. 9 Kazakhstan, Republic of 12.9% compare
  4. 11 Chile 12.5% compare
  5. 12 Vietnam 12.2% compare
  6. 13 Uruguay 12.0% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places β†’

More reference data data for Belarus, Republic of

All data for Belarus, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of was 12.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural recorded in Belarus, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 19.6% in 2013.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural recorded in Belarus, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 12.7% in 2017.
How does Belarus, Republic of rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
Belarus, Republic of ranks 10th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural rising or falling in Belarus, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is down 24.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 287 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population