Belarus vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Belarus
12.7%
in 2019
Poland
15.5%
in 2019
Belarus rank
11th
Poland rank
8th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 15.5% against 12.7% in Belarus, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 11th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 14.6% | 2.8% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 14.9% | 0.3% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 15.5% against 12.7% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Belarus and Poland?
- 2.8%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Belarus ranks 11th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population