Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile in Belarus
Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile was 0.4626 poorest in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
In 2019, benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile in Belarus stood at 0.4626 poorest. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is up 1.7% on the previous year and up 8.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile in Belarus peaked at 0.4626 poorest in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.4044 poorest, in 2008.
That places Belarus 2nd out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile in Belarus, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.4044 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.4262 poorest | +5.4% |
| 2010 | 0.409 poorest | -4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.4139 poorest | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.4348 poorest | +5.0% |
| 2014 | 0.4233 poorest | -2.7% |
| 2015 | 0.43 poorest | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 0.4433 poorest | +3.1% |
| 2017 | 0.4354 poorest | -1.8% |
| 2018 | 0.4547 poorest | +4.4% |
| 2019 | 0.4626 poorest | +1.7% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0.4626 poorest is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.148 poorest, 3.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0.4626 poorest is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.3667 poorest, 1.3× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4153 poorest | 0.4044 poorest | 0.4262 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.4341 poorest | 0.409 poorest | 0.4626 poorest | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile in Belarus?
- Benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile in Belarus was 0.4626 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4626 poorest in 2019.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4044 poorest in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile?
- Belarus ranks 2nd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)