Belarus vs Moldova: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile

Belarus
0.4626 poorest
in 2019
Moldova
0.4805 poorest
in 2018
Belarus rank
2nd
Moldova rank
1st

Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile over time

  • Belarus
  • Moldova
00.10.20.30.40.5200820132019

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 0.4805 poorest against 0.4626 poorest in Belarus, a difference of 0.0179 poorest.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 2nd and Moldova ranks 1st of 32 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile, Belarus or Moldova?
Moldova, at 0.4805 poorest against 0.4626 poorest in Belarus as of 2018.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile between Belarus and Moldova?
0.0179 poorest, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Moldova?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Belarus and Moldova rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile?
Belarus ranks 2nd and Moldova ranks 1st of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest)
Unit
poorest
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
33 places, 342 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)