Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) was 0.16 in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador is 0.16, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 36.8% on the previous year and up 21.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador peaked at 0.1801 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.074, in 2020.
Ecuador ranks 27th of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.1132 | — |
| 2010 | 0.1176 | +3.8% |
| 2011 | 0.1265 | +7.6% |
| 2012 | 0.1313 | +3.8% |
| 2014 | 0.1103 | -16.0% |
| 2015 | 0.141 | +27.9% |
| 2016 | 0.1801 | +27.7% |
| 2017 | 0.1163 | -35.4% |
| 2018 | 0.1337 | +14.9% |
| 2019 | 0.1372 | +2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.074 | -46.0% |
| 2021 | 0.117 | +58.0% |
| 2022 | 0.16 | +36.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1132 | 0.1132 | 0.1132 | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.1327 | 0.1103 | 0.1801 | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.117 | 0.074 | 0.16 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 24 Colombia 0.1909 compare
- 25 Kazakhstan 0.1875 compare
- 26 Brazil 0.1776 compare
- 28 Malawi 0.1559 compare
- 29 Burkina Faso 0.1406 compare
- 30 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.1263 compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Ecuador was 0.16 in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1801 in 2016.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.074 in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Ecuador ranks 27th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)