Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) was 0.1406 in 2021. ▼ Falling

Latest (2021)
0.1406
Change on year
down 14.6%
World rank
29th
of 35 countries
All-time high
0.2007
in 2003
All-time low
0.1406
in 2021
Years of data
5
2003–2021

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso, 2003–2021

00.050.10.150.22003201220212003: 0.2012009: 0.1832014: 0.1612018: 0.1652021: 0.141

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Burkina Faso recorded 0.1406 for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in 2021. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is down 14.6% on the previous year and down 23.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso peaked at 0.2007 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.1406, in 2021.

Burkina Faso ranks 29th of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso, year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural in Burkina Faso, 2003 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2003 0.2007
2009 0.1829 -8.9%
2014 0.1606 -12.2%
2018 0.1646 +2.5%
2021 0.1406 -14.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.1918 0.1829 0.2007 2
2010s 0.1626 0.1606 0.1646 2
2020s 0.1406 0.1406 0.1406 1

Countries ranked near Burkina Faso

  1. 26 Brazil 0.1776 compare
  2. 27 Ecuador 0.16 compare
  3. 28 Malawi 0.1559 compare
  4. 30 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.1263 compare
  5. 31 Peru 0.1255 compare
  6. 32 El Salvador 0.1228 compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Burkina Faso

All data for Burkina Faso →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso?
Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso was 0.1406 in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Burkina Faso?
The highest recorded value was 0.2007 in 2003.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Burkina Faso?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1406 in 2021.
How does Burkina Faso rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
Burkina Faso ranks 29th out of 35 countries with data for 2021.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
Over the last ten years it is down 23.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/burkina-faso/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Burkina Faso</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)