Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus
Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) was 0.2028 in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus stood at 0.2028.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and down 0.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus peaked at 0.2894 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.1735, in 2010.
That places Belarus 20th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.2373 | — |
| 2009 | 0.2044 | -13.9% |
| 2010 | 0.1735 | -15.2% |
| 2012 | 0.2894 | +66.8% |
| 2013 | 0.2513 | -13.2% |
| 2014 | 0.2201 | -12.4% |
| 2015 | 0.1793 | -18.6% |
| 2016 | 0.2141 | +19.4% |
| 2017 | 0.2122 | -0.9% |
| 2018 | 0.2018 | -4.9% |
| 2019 | 0.2028 | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2209 | 0.2044 | 0.2373 | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.2161 | 0.1735 | 0.2894 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus was 0.2028 in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2894 in 2012.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1735 in 2010.
- How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Belarus ranks 20th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)