Belarus vs Turkey: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Belarus
0.2028
in 2019
Turkey
0.2216
in 2013
Belarus rank
20th
Turkey rank
17th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Belarus
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 0.2216 against 0.2028 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0188.
That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Turkey ahead.
Belarus ranks 20th and Turkey ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2209 | 0.2892 | 0.0684 | Turkey |
| 2010s | 0.238 | 0.239 | 0.0009 | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest), Belarus or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 0.2216 against 0.2028 in Belarus as of 2013.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) between Belarus and Turkey?
- 0.0188, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Turkey rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Belarus ranks 20th and Turkey ranks 17th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)