Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador

Ecuador: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 22.3% in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
22.3%
Change on year
down 0.4%
World rank
4th
of 37 countries
All-time high
23.3%
in 2014
All-time low
20.6%
in 2008
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, 2008–2022

05101520252008201520222008: 20.62010: 21.62011: 22.92012: 22.72014: 23.32015: 21.22016: 21.22017: 21.12018: 22.42019: 21.22020: 22.62021: 22.42022: 22.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Ecuador recorded 22.3% for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2022.

The figure is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 1.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador peaked at 23.3% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 20.6%, in 2008.

Ecuador ranks 4th of 37 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 20.6%
2010 21.6% +5.1%
2011 22.9% +6.0%
2012 22.7% -1.1%
2014 23.3% +2.9%
2015 21.2% -9.3%
2016 21.2% +0.2%
2017 21.1% -0.4%
2018 22.4% +5.9%
2019 21.2% -5.3%
2020 22.6% +6.9%
2021 22.4% -1.2%
2022 22.3% -0.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 20.6% 20.6% 20.6% 1
2010s 22.0% 21.1% 23.3% 9
2020s 22.4% 22.3% 22.6% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 1 Viet Nam 25.1% compare
  2. 2 South Africa 24.3% compare
  3. 3 Costa Rica 22.6% compare
  4. 5 Pakistan 22.1% compare
  5. 6 Côte d'Ivoire 21.7% compare
  6. 7 Peru 21.3% compare

See the full ranking of 37 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador?
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador was 22.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 23.3% in 2014.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 20.6% in 2008.
How does Ecuador rank for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Ecuador ranks 4th out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
Is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/ecuador/">Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
37 places, 361 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population