Ecuador vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Ecuador
22.3%
in 2022
South Africa
24.3%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
4th
South Africa rank
2nd
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 24.3% against 22.3% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 2nd of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.9% | 20.9% | 1.0% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 22.5% | 25.0% | 2.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 24.3% against 22.3% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 2.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 2nd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population