Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Serbia

Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 20.1% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
20.1%
Change on year
up 15.2%
World rank
16th
of 35 countries
All-time high
20.1%
in 2022
All-time low
11.8%
in 2010
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Serbia, 2007–2022

051015202007201420222007: 15.32010: 11.82013: 12.92015: 12.72018: 12.52019: 15.22021: 17.52022: 20.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Serbia stood at 20.1%. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.

That represents a change of up 15.2% on the previous year and up 55.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Serbia peaked at 20.1% in 2022 and was at its lowest, 11.8%, in 2010.

Serbia ranks 16th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2007 15.3%
2010 11.8% -23.1%
2013 12.9% +9.7%
2015 12.7% -2.1%
2018 12.5% -1.4%
2019 15.2% +21.7%
2021 17.5% +14.9%
2022 20.1% +15.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 15.3% 15.3% 15.3% 1
2010s 13.0% 11.8% 15.2% 5
2020s 18.8% 17.5% 20.1% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 13 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 20.8% compare
  2. 14 Mexico 20.6% compare
  3. 15 Romania 20.2% compare
  4. 17 Republic of Moldova 20.1% compare
  5. 18 Peru 19.9% compare
  6. 19 Belarus 19.9% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Serbia?
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Serbia was 20.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 20.1% in 2022.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 11.8% in 2010.
How does Serbia rank for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Serbia ranks 16th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is up 55.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/serbia/">Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 336 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population