Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Peru
19.9%
in 2022
Serbia
20.1%
in 2022
Peru rank
18th
Serbia rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.1% against 19.9% in Peru, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.9% | 13.0% | 5.9% | Peru |
| 2020s | 19.7% | 18.8% | 0.9% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.1% against 19.9% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Peru ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 16th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population