Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in El Salvador
El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 18.7% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in El Salvador, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in El Salvador is 18.7%, measured in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.6% on the previous year and down 33.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in El Salvador peaked at 37.8% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 18.7%, in 2022.
El Salvador ranks 20th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 32.7% | — |
| 2008 | 34.1% | +4.4% |
| 2009 | 34.2% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 32.8% | -4.0% |
| 2011 | 31.6% | -3.6% |
| 2012 | 28.2% | -10.8% |
| 2014 | 31.8% | +12.6% |
| 2015 | 34.8% | +9.5% |
| 2016 | 36.8% | +5.9% |
| 2017 | 37.8% | +2.7% |
| 2018 | 37.3% | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 36.8% | -1.4% |
| 2021 | 19.0% | -48.3% |
| 2022 | 18.7% | -1.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.7% | 32.7% | 34.2% | 3 |
| 2010s | 34.2% | 28.2% | 37.8% | 9 |
| 2020s | 18.9% | 18.7% | 19.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
- 17 Costa Rica 21.0% compare
- 18 Paraguay 20.4% compare
- 19 Mongolia 20.2% compare
- 21 Kazakhstan 18.7% compare
- 22 Colombia 18.6% compare
- 23 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 17.0% compare
More reference data data for El Salvador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2714 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6267 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3176 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4948 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in El Salvador?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural in El Salvador was 18.7% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 37.8% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.7% in 2022.
- How does El Salvador rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 20th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group