El Salvador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
El Salvador
18.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
20.2%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
20th
Mongolia rank
19th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 20.2% against 18.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 19th of 35 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.4% | 20.0% | 13.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 33.1% | 15.5% | 17.6% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 20.2% against 18.7% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 19th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group