Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 20.3% in 2020. ▬ Flat

Latest (2020)
20.3%
Change on year
up 30.8%
World rank
18th
of 35 countries
All-time high
22.0%
in 2009
All-time low
9.9%
in 2012
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia, 2007–2020

051015202007201320202007: 21.62009: 222010: 11.82011: 14.32012: 9.92014: 14.22016: 21.72018: 15.52020: 20.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Mongolia stood at 20.3%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 30.8% on the previous year and up 71.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Mongolia peaked at 22.0% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 9.9%, in 2012.

Mongolia ranks 18th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 21.6%
2009 22.0% +1.9%
2010 11.8% -46.3%
2011 14.3% +21.1%
2012 9.9% -30.7%
2014 14.2% +43.4%
2016 21.7% +52.3%
2018 15.5% -28.5%
2020 20.3% +30.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 21.8% 21.6% 22.0% 2
2010s 14.6% 9.9% 21.7% 6
2020s 20.3% 20.3% 20.3% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 15 Mexico 22.9% compare
  2. 16 Serbia 21.5% compare
  3. 17 Uruguay 20.7% compare
  4. 19 Kazakhstan 20.1% compare
  5. 20 Türkiye 17.3% compare
  6. 21 El Salvador 16.5% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Mongolia was 20.3% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 22.0% in 2009.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 9.9% in 2012.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
Mongolia ranks 18th out of 35 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 71.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group