El Salvador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
16.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
20.3%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
21st
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 20.3% against 16.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 18th of 35 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.7% | 21.8% | 9.9% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 30.8% | 14.6% | 16.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 20.3% against 16.5% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 3.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 18th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group