Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 30.0% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
30.0%
Change on year
down 39.0%
World rank
11th
of 36 countries
All-time high
49.1%
in 2018
All-time low
14.4%
in 2006
Years of data
6
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

10203040502006201320202006: 14.4 preT2010: 45.7 preT2012: 27 preT2014: 35.9 preT2018: 49.1 preT2020: 30 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Viet Nam stood at 30.0%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 39.0% on the previous year and down 34.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Viet Nam peaked at 49.1% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 14.4%, in 2006.

Viet Nam ranks 11th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT) in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year preT Change
2006 14.4%
2010 45.7% +217.0%
2012 27.0% -41.0%
2014 35.9% +33.1%
2018 49.1% +36.9%
2020 30.0% -39.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 14.4% 14.4% 14.4% 1
2010s 39.4% 27.0% 49.1% 4
2020s 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 8 Thailand 41.8% compare
  2. 9 Mongolia 30.6% compare
  3. 10 Sri Lanka 30.0% compare
  4. 12 Pakistan 23.2% compare
  5. 13 Dominican Republic 22.6% compare
  6. 14 Argentina 22.5% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Viet Nam?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Viet Nam was 30.0% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 49.1% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 14.4% in 2006.
How does Viet Nam rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
Viet Nam ranks 11th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is down 34.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers-pret/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group