Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
30.6%
in 2020
Viet Nam
30.0%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
9th
Viet Nam rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 30.6% against 30.0% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 9th and Viet Nam ranks 11th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.6% | 39.4% | 18.8% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 30.6% | 30.0% | 0.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 30.6% against 30.0% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 9th and Viet Nam ranks 11th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group