Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 49.6% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
49.6%
Change on year
down 6.7%
World rank
11th
of 31 countries
All-time high
53.2%
in 2020
All-time low
4.2%
in 2014
Years of data
9
2007–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021

010203040502007201420212007: 8.22010: 19.52014: 4.22015: 44.52017: 472018: 47.62019: 52.82020: 53.22021: 49.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kazakhstan recorded 49.6% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2021.

That represents a change of down 6.7% on the previous year and up 154.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Kazakhstan peaked at 53.2% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 4.2%, in 2014.

That places Kazakhstan 11th out of 31 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Kazakhstan, 2007 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2007 8.2%
2010 19.5% +138.8%
2014 4.2% -78.7%
2015 44.5% +968.6%
2017 47.0% +5.8%
2018 47.6% +1.2%
2019 52.8% +11.0%
2020 53.2% +0.7%
2021 49.6% -6.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 1
2010s 35.9% 4.2% 52.8% 6
2020s 51.4% 49.6% 53.2% 2

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 8 Uruguay 55.1% compare
  2. 9 Colombia 51.8% compare
  3. 10 Türkiye 51.4% compare
  4. 12 Republic of Moldova 48.5% compare
  5. 13 Sri Lanka 43.6% compare
  6. 14 Serbia 43.2% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Kazakhstan?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Kazakhstan was 49.6% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 53.2% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 4.2% in 2014.
How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Kazakhstan ranks 11th out of 31 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 154.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/kazakhstan/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Kazakhstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group