Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Kazakhstan
49.6%
in 2021
Serbia
43.2%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
11th
Serbia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 49.6% against 43.2% in Serbia, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 14th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.2% | 42.3% | 34.1% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 41.1% | 46.6% | 5.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 49.6% | 49.4% | 0.2% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 49.6% against 43.2% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6.4%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 14th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group