Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 9.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
9.6%
Change on year
down 10.7%
World rank
34th
of 36 countries
All-time high
13.6%
in 2016
All-time low
6.6%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 6.62009: 9.92010: 9.12012: 10.82013: 10.92014: 112015: 122016: 13.62017: 10.62018: 10.82019: 9.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 9.6% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019.

That represents a change of down 10.7% on the previous year and down 3.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 13.6% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 6.6%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 6.6%
2009 9.9% +51.4%
2010 9.1% -8.1%
2012 10.8% +18.4%
2013 10.9% +0.9%
2014 11.0% +1.1%
2015 12.0% +8.6%
2016 13.6% +13.4%
2017 10.6% -22.0%
2018 10.8% +1.8%
2019 9.6% -10.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.2% 6.6% 9.9% 2
2010s 10.9% 9.1% 13.6% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 31 El Salvador 13.6% compare
  2. 32 Ecuador 13.3% compare
  3. 33 Cote d'Ivoire 12.3% compare
  4. 35 Panama 9.6% compare
  5. 36 Burkina Faso 9.4% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 9.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 13.6% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 6.6% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group