Belarus vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Belarus
9.6%
in 2019
El Salvador
13.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
34th
El Salvador rank
31st
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 13.6% against 9.6% in Belarus, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and El Salvador ranks 31st of 36 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.2% | 30.7% | 22.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 27.3% | 16.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 13.6% against 9.6% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 4.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 34th and El Salvador ranks 31st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group