Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador

Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 8.6% in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
8.6%
Change on year
up 32.3%
World rank
34th
of 35 countries
All-time high
31.5%
in 2011
All-time low
6.5%
in 2021
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, 2008–2022

510152025302008201520222008: 28.12010: 24.32011: 31.52012: 282014: 16.22015: 8.72016: 11.22017: 9.72018: 9.72019: 92020: 10.92021: 6.52022: 8.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Ecuador recorded 8.6% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2022.

The figure is up 32.3% on the previous year and down 69.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador peaked at 31.5% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 6.5%, in 2021.

Ecuador ranks 34th of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 28.1%
2010 24.3% -13.5%
2011 31.5% +29.6%
2012 28.0% -10.9%
2014 16.2% -42.2%
2015 8.7% -46.3%
2016 11.2% +28.5%
2017 9.7% -13.8%
2018 9.7% +0.8%
2019 9.0% -7.9%
2020 10.9% +22.1%
2021 6.5% -40.5%
2022 8.6% +32.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.1% 28.1% 28.1% 1
2010s 16.5% 8.7% 31.5% 9
2020s 8.7% 6.5% 10.9% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 31 Belarus 10.5% compare
  2. 32 Georgia 10.1% compare
  3. 33 Malawi 9.4% compare
  4. 35 Burkina Faso 7.9% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador was 8.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 31.5% in 2011.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 6.5% in 2021.
How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Ecuador ranks 34th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 69.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/ecuador/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group