Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 10.5% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
10.5%
Change on year
up 24.4%
World rank
31st
of 35 countries
All-time high
11.8%
in 2014
All-time low
6.2%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

02.557.51012.52008201320192008: 6.22009: 10.32010: 8.92012: 8.92013: 10.62014: 11.82015: 10.62016: 10.62017: 8.52018: 8.42019: 10.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 10.5% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 24.4% on the previous year and up 1.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 11.8% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 6.2%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 31st of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 6.2%
2009 10.3% +66.2%
2010 8.9% -14.2%
2012 8.9% +0.0%
2013 10.6% +19.8%
2014 11.8% +11.0%
2015 10.6% -9.9%
2016 10.6% -0.2%
2017 8.5% -20.2%
2018 8.4% -0.3%
2019 10.5% +24.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.3% 6.2% 10.3% 2
2010s 9.9% 8.4% 11.8% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 28 Panama 12.7% compare
  2. 29 Peru 12.0% compare
  3. 30 Chile 11.1% compare
  4. 32 Georgia 10.1% compare
  5. 33 Malawi 9.4% compare
  6. 34 Ecuador 8.6% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 10.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 11.8% in 2014.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 6.2% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 31st out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group