Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 78.8% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
78.8%
Change on year
up 41.6%
World rank
4th
of 31 countries
All-time high
78.8%
in 2019
All-time low
55.6%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland, 2005–2019

0204060802005201220192005: 73.22006: 67.72007: 66.92008: 65.62009: 65.52010: 66.62011: 66.32012: 65.32015: 67.42016: 68.72017: 55.62019: 78.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland is 78.8%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 41.6% on the previous year and up 20.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland peaked at 78.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 55.6%, in 2017.

That places Poland 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 73.2%
2006 67.7% -7.5%
2007 66.9% -1.1%
2008 65.6% -2.0%
2009 65.5% -0.0%
2010 66.6% +1.6%
2011 66.3% -0.3%
2012 65.3% -1.6%
2015 67.4% +3.2%
2016 68.7% +1.9%
2017 55.6% -19.0%
2019 78.8% +41.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 67.8% 65.5% 73.2% 5
2010s 67.0% 55.6% 78.8% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 1 Thailand 106.5% compare
  2. 2 Romania 93.0% compare
  3. 3 Belarus 91.8% compare
  4. 5 South Africa 69.4% compare
  5. 6 Uruguay 64.8% compare
  6. 7 Colombia 63.4% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland was 78.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 78.8% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 55.6% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Poland ranks 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group