Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 91.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
91.8%
Change on year
up 12.6%
World rank
3rd
of 31 countries
All-time high
91.9%
in 2016
All-time low
73.6%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060801002008201320192008: 73.62009: 77.42010: 76.52012: 80.22013: 83.62014: 88.22015: 90.12016: 91.92017: 90.42018: 81.62019: 91.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 91.8% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in 2019.

The figure is up 12.6% on the previous year and up 18.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 91.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 73.6%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 3rd of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 73.6%
2009 77.4% +5.1%
2010 76.5% -1.1%
2012 80.2% +4.8%
2013 83.6% +4.2%
2014 88.2% +5.5%
2015 90.1% +2.1%
2016 91.9% +2.0%
2017 90.4% -1.7%
2018 81.6% -9.7%
2019 91.8% +12.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 75.5% 73.6% 77.4% 2
2010s 86.0% 76.5% 91.9% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Thailand 106.5% compare
  2. 2 Romania 93.0% compare
  3. 4 Poland 78.8% compare
  4. 5 South Africa 69.4% compare
  5. 6 Uruguay 64.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 91.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 91.9% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 73.6% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group