Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 59.3% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
59.3%
Change on year
up 12.2%
World rank
5th
of 34 countries
All-time high
65.0%
in 2016
All-time low
46.4%
in 2009
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

02040602008201320192008: 47.7 preT2009: 46.4 preT2010: 49.3 preT2012: 49.7 preT2013: 54.5 preT2014: 55.4 preT2015: 57.8 preT2016: 65 preT2017: 57.6 preT2018: 52.8 preT2019: 59.3 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus is 59.3%, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.2% on the previous year and up 27.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 65.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 46.4%, in 2009.

Belarus ranks 5th of 34 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT) in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2008 47.7%
2009 46.4% -2.8%
2010 49.3% +6.2%
2012 49.7% +0.9%
2013 54.5% +9.6%
2014 55.4% +1.8%
2015 57.8% +4.2%
2016 65.0% +12.5%
2017 57.6% -11.3%
2018 52.8% -8.3%
2019 59.3% +12.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 47.1% 46.4% 47.7% 2
2010s 55.7% 49.3% 65.0% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 2 Romania 78.0% compare
  2. 3 Poland 77.9% compare
  3. 4 South Africa 70.9% compare
  4. 6 Türkiye 54.5% compare
  5. 7 Kazakhstan 54.5% compare
  6. 8 Uruguay 54.0% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 59.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 65.0% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 46.4% in 2009.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 5th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 27.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-pret/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-pret/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group