Belarus vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Belarus
59.3%
in 2019
Uruguay
54.0%
in 2022
Belarus rank
5th
Uruguay rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 59.3% against 54.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Uruguay ahead.
Belarus ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.1% | 49.6% | 2.5% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 55.9% | 54.0% | 1.9% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Belarus, at 59.3% against 54.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 5.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Belarus ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group