Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras

Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 21.5% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
21.5%
Change on year
up 9.4%
World rank
14th
of 36 countries
All-time high
31.2%
in 2013
All-time low
18.4%
in 2009
Years of data
10
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras, 2008–2019

01020302008201320192008: 29.82009: 18.42010: 26.12011: 27.52013: 31.22015: 23.82016: 20.42017: 21.32018: 19.72019: 21.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras stood at 21.5%.

That represents a change of up 9.4% on the previous year and up 16.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras peaked at 31.2% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 18.4%, in 2009.

Honduras ranks 14th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 10 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Honduras, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 29.8%
2009 18.4% -38.2%
2010 26.1% +41.4%
2011 27.5% +5.6%
2013 31.2% +13.2%
2015 23.8% -23.5%
2016 20.4% -14.2%
2017 21.3% +4.2%
2018 19.7% -7.5%
2019 21.5% +9.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 24.1% 18.4% 29.8% 2
2010s 23.9% 19.7% 31.2% 8

Countries ranked near Honduras

  1. 11 Viet Nam 34.6% compare
  2. 12 Mongolia 28.3% compare
  3. 13 Dominican Republic 24.6% compare
  4. 15 Serbia 20.3% compare
  5. 16 Kazakhstan 19.8% compare
  6. 17 Georgia 19.7% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Honduras

All data for Honduras →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Honduras was 21.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Honduras?
The highest recorded value was 31.2% in 2013.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Honduras?
The lowest recorded value was 18.4% in 2009.
How does Honduras rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Honduras ranks 14th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Honduras?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Honduras data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/honduras/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Honduras</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group