Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
24.6%
in 2021
Honduras
21.5%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
13th
Honduras rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 24.6% against 21.5% in Honduras, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Honduras ranks 14th of 36 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.2% | 24.1% | 0.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 24.8% | 23.9% | 0.9% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Dominican Republic, at 24.6% against 21.5% in Honduras as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 3.1%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Honduras ranks 14th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group