Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 63.7% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
63.7%
Change on year
down 4.1%
World rank
4th
of 35 countries
All-time high
82.2%
in 2015
All-time low
29.7%
in 2011
Years of data
11
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020

0204060802006201320202006: 38.62011: 29.72012: 332013: 52.12014: 64.32015: 82.22016: 61.32017: 75.52018: 692019: 66.42020: 63.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kyrgyzstan recorded 63.7% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2020.

The figure is down 4.1% on the previous year and up 114.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 82.2% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 29.7%, in 2011.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 35 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Kyrgyzstan, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 38.6%
2011 29.7% -23.0%
2012 33.0% +11.2%
2013 52.1% +57.6%
2014 64.3% +23.4%
2015 82.2% +27.9%
2016 61.3% -25.4%
2017 75.5% +23.2%
2018 69.0% -8.6%
2019 66.4% -3.8%
2020 63.7% -4.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 38.6% 38.6% 38.6% 1
2010s 59.3% 29.7% 82.2% 9
2020s 63.7% 63.7% 63.7% 1

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 1 Poland 7,251.1% compare
  2. 2 Viet Nam 117.9% compare
  3. 3 Republic of Moldova 68.4% compare
  4. 5 Armenia 52.7% compare
  5. 6 South Africa 51.0% compare
  6. 7 Thailand 46.6% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kyrgyzstan?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Kyrgyzstan was 63.7% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 82.2% in 2015.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 29.7% in 2011.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th out of 35 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 114.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/kyrgyz-republic/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group