Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Armenia
52.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
63.7%
in 2020
Armenia rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 63.7% against 52.7% in Armenia, a difference of 11.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.1% | 59.3% | 25.9% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 60.8% | 63.7% | 2.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 63.7% against 52.7% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 11.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Armenia ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group