Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 78.5% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
78.5%
Change on year
up 25.3%
World rank
4th
of 31 countries
All-time high
78.5%
in 2019
All-time low
62.7%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland, 2005–2019

0204060802005201220192005: 69.62006: 712007: 71.52008: 69.52009: 69.92010: 69.82011: 69.52012: 71.22015: 68.72016: 68.92017: 62.72019: 78.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland is 78.5%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 25.3% on the previous year and up 12.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland peaked at 78.5% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 62.7%, in 2017.

That places Poland 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 69.6%
2006 71.0% +1.9%
2007 71.5% +0.7%
2008 69.5% -2.8%
2009 69.9% +0.6%
2010 69.8% -0.2%
2011 69.5% -0.4%
2012 71.2% +2.5%
2015 68.7% -3.6%
2016 68.9% +0.3%
2017 62.7% -9.0%
2019 78.5% +25.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 70.3% 69.5% 71.5% 5
2010s 69.9% 62.7% 78.5% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 1 Thailand 117.6% compare
  2. 2 Belarus 98.6% compare
  3. 3 Romania 93.2% compare
  4. 5 Serbia 67.0% compare
  5. 6 Brazil 64.9% compare
  6. 7 Republic of Moldova 60.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Poland was 78.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 78.5% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 62.7% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Poland ranks 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 291 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group