Brazil vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Brazil
64.9%
in 2022
Poland
78.5%
in 2019
Brazil rank
6th
Poland rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Brazil
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 78.5% against 64.9% in Brazil, a difference of 13.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Brazil ranks 6th and Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.2% | 70.4% | 11.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 65.6% | 69.9% | 4.3% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Brazil or Poland?
- Poland, at 78.5% against 64.9% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Brazil and Poland?
- 13.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Brazil ranks 6th and Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group