Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 13.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
13.1%
Change on year
up 14.5%
World rank
33rd
of 36 countries
All-time high
14.9%
in 2014
All-time low
8.3%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 8.32009: 12.82010: 11.12012: 13.12013: 13.62014: 14.92015: 12.92016: 14.12017: 11.12018: 11.42019: 13.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 13.1% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019.

The figure is up 14.5% on the previous year and up 2.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 14.9% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 8.3%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 33rd out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 8.3%
2009 12.8% +54.7%
2010 11.1% -13.2%
2012 13.1% +18.0%
2013 13.6% +3.3%
2014 14.9% +10.1%
2015 12.9% -13.7%
2016 14.1% +9.4%
2017 11.1% -21.4%
2018 11.4% +3.1%
2019 13.1% +14.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 10.5% 8.3% 12.8% 2
2010s 12.8% 11.1% 14.9% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 30 Brazil 16.1% compare
  2. 31 Panama 13.5% compare
  3. 32 Ecuador 13.1% compare
  4. 34 Cote d'Ivoire 12.5% compare
  5. 35 Burkina Faso 8.3% compare
  6. 36 Malawi 8.0% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 13.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 14.9% in 2014.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 8.3% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 33rd out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group