Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Belarus
13.1%
in 2019
Ecuador
13.1%
in 2022
Belarus rank
33rd
Ecuador rank
32nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 13.1% against 13.1% in Belarus, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.3% | 34.6% | 26.3% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 20.4% | 7.7% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 13.1% against 13.1% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group