Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory was 81.1% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
81.1%
Change on year
up 6.9%
World rank
7th
of 30 countries
All-time high
117.5%
in 2014
All-time low
75.9%
in 2018
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, 2008–2019

02550751001252008201320192008: 81.82009: 932010: 104.92012: 94.22013: 104.42014: 117.52015: 88.42016: 77.32017: 87.92018: 75.92019: 81.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus stood at 81.1%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.9% on the previous year and down 12.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus peaked at 117.5% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 75.9%, in 2018.

That places Belarus 7th out of 30 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 81.8%
2009 93.0% +13.7%
2010 104.9% +12.9%
2012 94.2% -10.2%
2013 104.4% +10.8%
2014 117.5% +12.5%
2015 88.4% -24.8%
2016 77.3% -12.6%
2017 87.9% +13.8%
2018 75.9% -13.7%
2019 81.1% +6.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 87.4% 81.8% 93.0% 2
2010s 92.4% 75.9% 117.5% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 4 South Africa 100.0% compare
  2. 5 Poland 89.5% compare
  3. 6 Serbia 81.9% compare
  4. 8 Sri Lanka 71.3% compare
  5. 9 Brazil 71.2% compare
  6. 10 Uruguay 68.5% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus was 81.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 117.5% in 2014.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 75.9% in 2018.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
Belarus ranks 7th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 273 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group