Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Belarus
81.1%
in 2019
Poland
89.5%
in 2019
Belarus rank
7th
Poland rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 89.5% against 81.1% in Belarus, a difference of 8.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and Poland ranks 5th of 30 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.4% | 78.5% | 8.9% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 89.0% | 81.4% | 7.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 89.5% against 81.1% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Belarus and Poland?
- 8.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Poland ranks 5th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group