Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 63.9% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
63.9%
Change on year
down 22.3%
World rank
3rd
of 36 countries
All-time high
94.9%
in 2018
All-time low
41.4%
in 2011
Years of data
11
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020

0204060801002006201320202006: 54.62011: 41.42012: 43.22013: 53.72014: 64.82015: 92.52016: 70.42017: 85.82018: 94.92019: 82.22020: 63.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan stood at 63.9%.

The figure is down 22.3% on the previous year and up 54.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 94.9% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 41.4%, in 2011.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 54.6%
2011 41.4% -24.2%
2012 43.2% +4.5%
2013 53.7% +24.2%
2014 64.8% +20.7%
2015 92.5% +42.8%
2016 70.4% -24.0%
2017 85.8% +22.0%
2018 94.9% +10.6%
2019 82.2% -13.4%
2020 63.9% -22.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 54.6% 54.6% 54.6% 1
2010s 69.9% 41.4% 94.9% 9
2020s 63.9% 63.9% 63.9% 1

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 1 Poland 11,764.1% compare
  2. 2 Armenia 78.4% compare
  3. 4 Republic of Moldova 60.9% compare
  4. 5 Viet Nam 59.3% compare
  5. 6 South Africa 57.8% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan was 63.9% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 94.9% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 41.4% in 2011.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 54.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers/kyrgyz-republic/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group