Kyrgyzstan vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Kyrgyzstan
63.9%
in 2020
Viet Nam
59.3%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Viet Nam rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 63.9% against 59.3% in Viet Nam, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.6% | 11.5% | 43.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 67.6% | 30.8% | 36.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 63.9% | 59.3% | 4.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Kyrgyzstan or Viet Nam?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 63.9% against 59.3% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 4.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group