Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 14.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus is 14.0%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of down 4.3% on the previous year and down 14.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 19.3% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 8.4%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 34th of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 8.4% | — |
| 2009 | 16.4% | +95.0% |
| 2010 | 13.2% | -19.3% |
| 2012 | 14.1% | +6.3% |
| 2013 | 19.3% | +37.1% |
| 2014 | 17.2% | -10.9% |
| 2015 | 14.2% | -17.6% |
| 2016 | 17.7% | +24.7% |
| 2017 | 10.9% | -38.5% |
| 2018 | 14.6% | +34.3% |
| 2019 | 14.0% | -4.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.4% | 8.4% | 16.4% | 2 |
| 2010s | 15.0% | 10.9% | 19.3% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 31 Ecuador 16.5% compare
- 32 Côte d'Ivoire 15.8% compare
- 33 Pakistan 15.6% compare
- 35 Malawi 9.3% compare
- 36 Burkina Faso 7.7% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 14.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 19.3% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.4% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 34th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group