Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
14.0%
in 2019
Ecuador
16.5%
in 2022
Belarus rank
34th
Ecuador rank
31st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 16.5% against 14.0% in Belarus, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 31st of 36 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.4% | 39.6% | 31.2% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 14.5% | 27.2% | 12.7% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 16.5% against 14.0% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 2.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 31st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group