Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Brazil

Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 27.6% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
27.6%
Change on year
down 6.5%
World rank
17th
of 35 countries
All-time high
68.0%
in 2011
All-time low
14.4%
in 2015
Years of data
12
2006–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Brazil, 2006–2022

2040602006201420222006: 39.22009: 352011: 682012: 66.32015: 14.42016: 33.82017: 37.72018: 33.32019: 35.52020: 23.82021: 29.52022: 27.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Brazil stood at 27.6%.

The figure is down 6.5% on the previous year and down 58.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Brazil peaked at 68.0% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 14.4%, in 2015.

Brazil ranks 17th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Brazil, 2006 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2006 39.2%
2009 35.0% -10.7%
2011 68.0% +94.4%
2012 66.3% -2.5%
2015 14.4% -78.3%
2016 33.8% +134.8%
2017 37.7% +11.5%
2018 33.3% -11.7%
2019 35.5% +6.6%
2020 23.8% -33.0%
2021 29.5% +24.2%
2022 27.6% -6.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 37.1% 35.0% 39.2% 2
2010s 41.3% 14.4% 68.0% 7
2020s 27.0% 23.8% 29.5% 3

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 14 Sri Lanka 36.2% compare
  2. 15 Paraguay 35.7% compare
  3. 16 Colombia 31.5% compare
  4. 18 Honduras 26.9% compare
  5. 19 El Salvador 26.8% compare
  6. 20 Pakistan 26.4% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Brazil?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Brazil was 27.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 68.0% in 2011.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 14.4% in 2015.
How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Brazil ranks 17th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is down 58.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/brazil/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group