Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Brazil
27.6%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
36.2%
in 2019
Brazil rank
17th
Sri Lanka rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 36.2% against 27.6% in Brazil, a difference of 8.6%.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 35 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.1% | 28.4% | 8.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 45.2% | 34.9% | 10.2% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 36.2% against 27.6% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 8.6%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group