Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 58.5% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 58.5% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2020.
That represents a change of down 21.6% on the previous year and up 32.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 94.5% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 40.8%, in 2012.
That places Kyrgyzstan 4th out of 36 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 51.2% | — |
| 2011 | 44.2% | -13.8% |
| 2012 | 40.8% | -7.7% |
| 2013 | 48.9% | +20.0% |
| 2014 | 60.6% | +23.9% |
| 2015 | 83.5% | +37.7% |
| 2016 | 60.5% | -27.5% |
| 2017 | 75.2% | +24.2% |
| 2018 | 94.5% | +25.7% |
| 2019 | 74.7% | -21.0% |
| 2020 | 58.5% | -21.6% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 58.5% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 25.8%, 2.3× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 58.5% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 48.0%, 1.2× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 51.2% | 51.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 64.7% | 40.8% | 94.5% | 9 |
| 2020s | 58.5% | 58.5% | 58.5% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 1 Poland 10,063.7% compare
- 2 Viet Nam 121.9% compare
- 3 Armenia 69.2% compare
- 5 South Africa 58.1% compare
- 6 Republic of Moldova 55.8% compare
- 7 Kosovo 51.0% compare
- 7 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 51.0% compare
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan was 58.5% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 94.5% in 2018.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 40.8% in 2012.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group