Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
69.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
58.5%
in 2020
Armenia rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 69.2% against 58.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 10.7%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.4% | 64.7% | 35.6% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 59.8% | 58.5% | 1.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 69.2% against 58.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10.7%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group