Korea, Rep. vs Tonga: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Korea, Rep.
70.99 0-100
in 2024
Tonga
71.21 0-100
in 2024
Korea, Rep. rank
53rd
Tonga rank
52nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Korea, Rep.
  • Tonga
020406080199620102024

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 71.21 0-100 against 70.99 0-100 in Korea, Rep., a difference of 0.22 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Korea, Rep. ahead.

Korea, Rep. ranks 53rd and Tonga ranks 52nd of 206 countries.

Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea, Rep. Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 68.11 0-100 58.18 0-100 9.92 0-100 Korea, Rep.
2000s 70.43 0-100 57.29 0-100 13.15 0-100 Korea, Rep.
2010s 71.26 0-100 64.46 0-100 6.8 0-100 Korea, Rep.
2020s 72.99 0-100 72.27 0-100 0.7227 0-100 Korea, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Korea, Rep. or Tonga?
Tonga, at 71.21 0-100 against 70.99 0-100 in Korea, Rep. as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Korea, Rep. and Tonga?
0.22 0-100, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Tonga?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Korea, Rep. and Tonga rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Korea, Rep. ranks 53rd and Tonga ranks 52nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).