Dominican Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Dominican Republic
60.37 0-100
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
59.73 0-100
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
89th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
90th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 60.37 0-100 against 59.73 0-100 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.64 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 89th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 207 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 52.5 0-100 63.96 0-100 11.46 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 56.7 0-100 61.16 0-100 4.46 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 56.86 0-100 60.01 0-100 3.15 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 59.02 0-100 59.18 0-100 0.1562 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Dominican Republic or Sao Tome and Principe?
Dominican Republic, at 60.37 0-100 against 59.73 0-100 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Dominican Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.64 0-100, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Dominican Republic ranks 89th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/dominican-republic/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/dominican-republic/sao-tome-and-principe/">Dominican Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).