Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 60.37 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Dominican Republic, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance score in Dominican Republic stood at 60.37 0-100. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.5% on the previous year and up 4.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Dominican Republic peaked at 60.37 0-100 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 52.03 0-100, in 1998.
Dominican Republic ranks 89th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52.5 0-100 | 52.03 0-100 | 52.98 0-100 | 2 |
| 2000s | 56.7 0-100 | 54.31 0-100 | 58.41 0-100 | 9 |
| 2010s | 56.86 0-100 | 56.23 0-100 | 57.73 0-100 | 10 |
| 2020s | 59.02 0-100 | 57.96 0-100 | 60.37 0-100 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance score in Dominican Republic?
- Voice and accountability - governance score in Dominican Republic was 60.37 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 60.37 0-100 in 2024.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 52.03 0-100 in 1998.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 89th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).