Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Maldives: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Maldives
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 49.93 0-100 against 49.64 0-100 in Maldives, a difference of 0.29 0-100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Maldives ranks 127th of 207 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.26 0-100 | 41.57 0-100 | 12.7 0-100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 58.58 0-100 | 44.49 0-100 | 14.09 0-100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 52.5 0-100 | 48.92 0-100 | 3.58 0-100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 49.01 0-100 | 53 0-100 | 4 0-100 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Maldives?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 49.93 0-100 against 49.64 0-100 in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Maldives?
- 0.29 0-100, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Maldives?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Maldives rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Maldives ranks 127th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).